The U.S. Should Adopt the "Right to Be Forgotten" Online : a Debate
(eVideo)
Contributors
Status
Description
Loading Description...
Also in this Series
Checking series information...
Subjects
LC Subjects
OCLC Fast Subjects
More Details
Published
Intelligence2
Format
eVideo
Language
English
Notes
General Note
Streaming video file encoded with permission for digital streaming by Films Media Group on September 09, 2015.
General Note
Title from distributor's description (Films Media Group, October 1 2015).
Restrictions on Access
Access requires authentication through Films on Demand.
Description
In 2014, the European Union's Court of Justice ruled that individuals have a right to be forgotten online, "the right-under certain conditions-to ask search engines to remove links with personal information about them." This right is not absolute, however, but meant to be balanced against other fundamental rights, like freedom of expression. In the six months following the court's decision, Google received more than 180,000 removal requests. Of those reviewed and processed, 41% were granted. Largely seen as a victory by Europeans, the reaction among Americans was overwhelmingly negative. Was the Court of Justice's ruling a win for privacy and human dignity, or a blow to free speech and public information? Should the United States adopt the "right to be forgotten" online?
Target Audience
9 & up.
Language
Closed-captioned.
Local note
InfoBase Learning,Films on Demand: Master Academic Collection - US
Citations
APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)
The U.S. Should Adopt the "Right to Be Forgotten" Online: a Debate .
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)The U.S. Should Adopt the "Right to Be Forgotten" Online: A Debate. Intelligence2.
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)The U.S. Should Adopt the "Right to Be Forgotten" Online: A Debate Intelligence2.
Harvard Citation (style guide)(n.d.). The U.S. should adopt the "right to be forgotten" online: a debate. Intelligence2.
MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)The U.S. Should Adopt the "Right to Be Forgotten" Online: A Debate
Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.
Staff View
Grouped Work ID
0c014ca5-09d8-9291-714b-a7d0ec93d605-eng
Grouping Information
Grouped Work ID | 0c014ca5-09d8-9291-714b-a7d0ec93d605-eng |
---|---|
Full title | u s should adopt the right to be forgotten online a debate |
Author | films media group |
Grouping Category | movie |
Last Update | 2024-08-18 06:56:03AM |
Last Indexed | 2025-01-30 02:02:19AM |
Marc Record
First Detected | Aug 13, 2024 02:33:20 PM |
---|---|
Last File Modification Time | Aug 13, 2024 02:33:20 PM |
MARC Record
LEADER | 05228cgm a2200697 a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | ocn931094964 | ||
003 | OCoLC | ||
005 | 20240805213015.0 | ||
006 | m o c | ||
007 | vz czazuu | ||
007 | cr cna|||||||| | ||
008 | 151116p20152015nyu092 o vleng d | ||
019 | |a 951066563|a 979818205|a 987730719|a 988231033|a 1008840501|a 1027735317|a 1037254221|a 1086984782|a 1111376129|a 1119109939|a 1132670314|a 1354798233 | ||
028 | 4 | 0 | |a 94776|b Films Media Group |
035 | |a (OCoLC)931094964|z (OCoLC)951066563|z (OCoLC)979818205|z (OCoLC)987730719|z (OCoLC)988231033|z (OCoLC)1008840501|z (OCoLC)1027735317|z (OCoLC)1037254221|z (OCoLC)1086984782|z (OCoLC)1111376129|z (OCoLC)1119109939|z (OCoLC)1132670314|z (OCoLC)1354798233 | ||
040 | |a ACCEM|b eng|c ACCEM|d OCLCO|d TUU|d OCLCF|d OCLCA|d U3G|d IWS|d NKT|d OCLCQ|d OCLCO|d CSF|d AGLDB|d CN8BJ|d OCLCQ|d FSP|d UOK|d CEF|d NYINF|d NTG|d WYU|d YOU|d HQD|d OCLCA|d CNNOR|d OCLCA|d OCLCO|d AZK|d OCLCQ | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng|j eng|h eng | |
049 | |a SNCA | ||
050 | 4 | |a PN1997 | |
082 | 1 | 4 | |a [E] |
245 | 0 | 4 | |a The U.S. Should Adopt the "Right to Be Forgotten" Online :|b a Debate /|c Intelligence2. |
246 | 3 | |a Right to Be Forgotten | |
264 | 1 | |a Intelligence2,|e production company. | |
264 | 3 | 2 | |a New York, N.Y. :|b Distributed by Films Media Group,|c 2015. |
264 | 4 | |c ©2015 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (1 video file (1 hr., 31 min., 36 sec.)) :|b sound, color | ||
336 | |a two-dimensional moving image|b tdi|2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer|b c|2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource|b cr|2 rdacarrier | ||
344 | |a digital|2 rda | ||
347 | |a data file|2 rda | ||
380 | |a Videorecording | ||
500 | |a Streaming video file encoded with permission for digital streaming by Films Media Group on September 09, 2015. | ||
500 | |a Title from distributor's description (Films Media Group, October 1 2015). | ||
505 | 0 | 0 | |t Introduction: Right to Be Forgotten Online Debate|g (1:22) --|t Debate "Housekeeping"|g (4:22) --|t For the Motion: Paul Nemitz|g (7:28) --|t Against the Motion: Andrew McLaughlin|g (7:16) --|t For the Motion: Eric Posner|g (7:25) --|t Against the Motion: Jonathan Zittrain|g (7:04) --|t Encouraging Censorship?|g (7:44) --|t Internet Search Results|g (3:01) --|t Chilling Effects|g (2:10) --|t Criteria for Information Removal|g (3:24) --|t Allowing Elite Abilities|g (3:32) --|t Q & A: Right Infringements|g (1:35) --|t Q & A: Google's Power|g (2:05) --|t Q & A: Law Tailored to Google|g (2:40) --|t Q & A: Administrative Criteria|g (3:03) --|t Q & A: 4th Amendment Context|g (1:45) --|t Q & A: Validity of Anonymity|g (1:34) --|t Q & A: Law Application|g (2:16) --|t Q & A: Oklahoma University Students' Racist Remarks|g (4:17) --|t Q & A: Adjudicating Power|g (3:42) --|t Concluding Statements For: Paul Nemitz|g (2:10) --|t Concluding Statements Against: Andrew McLaughlin|g (2:19) --|t Concluding Statements For: Eric Posner|g (2:02) --|t Concluding Statements Against: Jonathan Zittrain|g (2:15) --|t Debate Wrap Up|g (3:07) --|t Audience Voting Results|g (0:50) --|t Credits: The U.S. Should Adopt the "Right to Be Forgotten" Online: A Debate|g (0:58) --|t Trying Out Segment Feature|g (4:22). |
506 | |a Access requires authentication through Films on Demand. | ||
520 | |a In 2014, the European Union's Court of Justice ruled that individuals have a right to be forgotten online, "the right-under certain conditions-to ask search engines to remove links with personal information about them." This right is not absolute, however, but meant to be balanced against other fundamental rights, like freedom of expression. In the six months following the court's decision, Google received more than 180,000 removal requests. Of those reviewed and processed, 41% were granted. Largely seen as a victory by Europeans, the reaction among Americans was overwhelmingly negative. Was the Court of Justice's ruling a win for privacy and human dignity, or a blow to free speech and public information? Should the United States adopt the "right to be forgotten" online? | ||
521 | 2 | |a 9 & up. | |
546 | |a Closed-captioned. | ||
590 | |a InfoBase Learning|b Films on Demand: Master Academic Collection - US | ||
650 | 0 | |a Data protection|x Law and legislation. | |
650 | 0 | |a Privacy, Right of. | |
650 | 0 | |a Right to be forgotten. | |
650 | 6 | |a Droit à l'oubli. | |
650 | 7 | |a Data protection|x Law and legislation.|2 fast|0 (OCoLC)fst00887963 | |
650 | 7 | |a Privacy, Right of.|2 fast|0 (OCoLC)fst01077444 | |
650 | 7 | |a Right to be forgotten.|2 fast|0 (OCoLC)fst01923116 | |
655 | 2 | |a Webcast | |
655 | 7 | |a Educational films.|2 fast|0 (OCoLC)fst01726235 | |
655 | 7 | |a Internet videos.|2 fast|0 (OCoLC)fst01750214 | |
655 | 7 | |a Educational films.|2 lcgft | |
655 | 7 | |a Internet videos.|2 lcgft | |
655 | 7 | |a Films éducatifs.|2 rvmgf | |
655 | 7 | |a Vidéos sur Internet.|2 rvmgf | |
710 | 2 | |a Films Media Group,|e film distributor. | |
710 | 2 | |a Intelligence² (U.S.),|e production company. | |
776 | 0 | 8 | |i Digital transfer of (manifestation):|d Intelligence2, 2015 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://login.aclibproxy.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://fod.infobase.com/portalPlaylists.aspx?e=1&xtid=94776&wid=18502 |
938 | |a Access Educational Media|b ACEM|n 100094776 | ||
938 | |a Infobase Publishing|b INFO|n 100094776 | ||
994 | |a 92|b SNC |