Should We Address the Gender Wage Gap?, A Debate
(eVideo)
Contributors
Status
Description
Loading Description...
Also in this Series
Checking series information...
More Details
Published
[Place of publication not identified] : Open to Debate, [2024].
Format
eVideo
Language
English
Notes
General Note
Originally released by Open to Debate, 2024.
General Note
Streaming video file encoded with permission for digital streaming by Infobase on June 06, 2024.
Restrictions on Access
Access requires authentication through Films on Demand.
Description
According to the U.S. Department of Labor, American women are paid 84 cents on average, for every dollar men make. This wage gap has persisted despite near-record rates of women's participation in the labor market, with wage gaps even larger for women in minority populations, and experts estimate that pay parity will not be achieved until 2052. Should policy interventions address these disparities, or is it more important to recognize and honor women's personal decisions and find another way to look at the gap?Supporters of addressing the gender wage gap see it as a point of fairness and equity that would bring economic benefits, they argue, such as higher family incomes and greater productivity. New laws and policies, they contend, are needed to dismantle systemic barriers that prevent women from earning more. Opponents of addressing the gender wage gap argue that such disparities reflect individual choices regarding career paths, work-life balance, and tenure, rather than systemic discrimination. They also contend that when adjusted for factors like job type, hours worked, and taking breaks in one's career, the gap significantly narrows. Should we address the gender wage gap?
Target Audience
9 - 12, Academic/AP
System Details
Streaming video file.
System Details
System requirements: FOD playback platform.
Language
Closed-captioned.
Local note
InfoBase Learning,Films on Demand: Master Academic Collection - US
Citations
APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)
(2024). Should We Address the Gender Wage Gap?, A Debate . Open to Debate.
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)2024. Should We Address the Gender Wage Gap?, A Debate. [Place of publication not identified]: Open to Debate.
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Should We Address the Gender Wage Gap?, A Debate [Place of publication not identified]: Open to Debate, 2024.
Harvard Citation (style guide)(2024). Should we address the gender wage gap?, A debate. [Place of publication not identified]: Open to Debate.
MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)Should We Address the Gender Wage Gap?, A Debate Open to Debate, 2024.
Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.
Staff View
Grouped Work ID
30e6ef6d-c991-eb7b-32eb-b8484085d152-eng
Grouping Information
| Grouped Work ID | 30e6ef6d-c991-eb7b-32eb-b8484085d152-eng |
|---|---|
| Full title | should we address the gender wage gap a debate |
| Author | infobase |
| Grouping Category | movie |
| Last Update | 2024-08-13 14:31:09PM |
| Last Indexed | 2024-12-18 02:08:25AM |
Marc Record
| First Detected | Aug 13, 2024 02:37:31 PM |
|---|---|
| Last File Modification Time | Aug 13, 2024 02:37:31 PM |
MARC Record
| LEADER | 03409ngm a2200649 i 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | on1439290643 | ||
| 003 | OCoLC | ||
| 005 | 20240805213015.0 | ||
| 006 | m o c | ||
| 007 | vz czazuu | ||
| 007 | cr cna|||||||| | ||
| 008 | 240614p20242024nyu055 o vleng d | ||
| 028 | 4 | 0 | |a 293487|b Infobase |
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)1439290643 | ||
| 040 | |a ORZ|b eng|e rda|c ORZ|d OCLCO | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng|j eng|h eng | |
| 046 | |k 2024 | ||
| 049 | |a SNCA | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a Should We Address the Gender Wage Gap?, A Debate /|c Open to Debate. |
| 264 | 1 | |a [Place of publication not identified] :|b Open to Debate,|c [2024] | |
| 264 | 3 | 2 | |a New York, N.Y. :|b Distributed by Infobase,|c 2024. |
| 264 | 4 | |c ©2024 | |
| 300 | |a 1 online resource (1 video file (55 min., 24 sec)) :|b sound. | ||
| 336 | |a two-dimensional moving image|b tdi|2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a computer|b c|2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a online resource|b cr|2 rdacarrier | ||
| 347 | |a video file|2 rda | ||
| 500 | |a Originally released by Open to Debate, 2024. | ||
| 500 | |a Streaming video file encoded with permission for digital streaming by Infobase on June 06, 2024. | ||
| 506 | 1 | |a Access requires authentication through Films on Demand. | |
| 520 | |a According to the U.S. Department of Labor, American women are paid 84 cents on average, for every dollar men make. This wage gap has persisted despite near-record rates of women's participation in the labor market, with wage gaps even larger for women in minority populations, and experts estimate that pay parity will not be achieved until 2052. Should policy interventions address these disparities, or is it more important to recognize and honor women's personal decisions and find another way to look at the gap?Supporters of addressing the gender wage gap see it as a point of fairness and equity that would bring economic benefits, they argue, such as higher family incomes and greater productivity. New laws and policies, they contend, are needed to dismantle systemic barriers that prevent women from earning more. Opponents of addressing the gender wage gap argue that such disparities reflect individual choices regarding career paths, work-life balance, and tenure, rather than systemic discrimination. They also contend that when adjusted for factors like job type, hours worked, and taking breaks in one's career, the gap significantly narrows. Should we address the gender wage gap? | ||
| 521 | 2 | |a 9 - 12, Academic/AP | |
| 538 | |a Streaming video file. | ||
| 538 | |a System requirements: FOD playback platform. | ||
| 546 | |a Closed-captioned. | ||
| 588 | |a Title from distributor's description | ||
| 590 | |a InfoBase Learning|b Films on Demand: Master Academic Collection - US | ||
| 650 | 0 | |a Equality. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Sex. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Sexism. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Social status. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Sociology. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Wealth. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Sexualité. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Statut social. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Sociologie. | |
| 650 | 6 | |a Richesse. | |
| 650 | 7 | |a sexuality.|2 aat | |
| 650 | 7 | |a social status.|2 aat | |
| 650 | 7 | |a sociology.|2 aat | |
| 650 | 7 | |a wealth.|2 aat | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Internet videos.|2 lcgft | |
| 655 | 7 | |a Vidéos sur Internet.|2 rvmgf | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Infobase,|e film distributor. | |
| 710 | 2 | |a Open to Debate (Firm) | |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://login.aclibproxy.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://fod.infobase.com/portalPlaylists.aspx?e=1&xtid=293487&wid=18502 |
| 994 | |a 92|b SNC | ||