The female in Aristotle's biology : reason or rationalization
(Book)
Author
Status
General Shelving - 3rd Floor
HQ1233 .M359 2004
1 available
HQ1233 .M359 2004
1 available
Description
Loading Description...
Also in this Series
Checking series information...
Copies
Location | Call Number | Status |
---|---|---|
General Shelving - 3rd Floor | HQ1233 .M359 2004 | On Shelf |
Subjects
OCLC Fast Subjects
Other Subjects
880-02 -- Aristotle.
Aristote.
Aristoteles.
Aristotle.
AristÓteles, -- 384-322 A. C.
Biologie
Biology -- history
Feminismo (discriminação)
Femmes.
Griekse oudheid.
Misogynie.
Mulheres (filosofia)
Natuurfilosofie.
Philosophie.
Philosophy
philosophy.
Vrouwelijk geslacht (biologie)
Weiblichkeit
Women
women (female humans)
Aristote.
Aristoteles.
Aristotle.
AristÓteles, -- 384-322 A. C.
Biologie
Biology -- history
Feminismo (discriminação)
Femmes.
Griekse oudheid.
Misogynie.
Mulheres (filosofia)
Natuurfilosofie.
Philosophie.
Philosophy
philosophy.
Vrouwelijk geslacht (biologie)
Weiblichkeit
Women
women (female humans)
More Details
Format
Book
Physical Desc
x, 136 pages ; 24 cm
Language
English
Notes
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 119-124) and indexes.
Description
"While Aristotle's writings on biology are considered to be among his best, the comments he makes about females in these works are widely regarded as the nadir of his philosophical oeuvre. Among many claims, Aristotle is said to have declared that females contribute nothing substantial to generation; that they have fewer teeth than males; that they are less spirited than males; and that women are analogous to eunuchs. In The Female in Aristotle's Biology, Robert Mayhew aims not to defend Aristotle's ideas about females but to defend Aristotle against the common charge that his writings on female species were motivated by ideological bias."
Description
"Mayhew points out that the tools of modern science and scientific experimentation were not available to the Greeks during Aristotle's time and that, consequently, Aristotle had relied not only on empirical observations when writing about living organisms but also on a fair amount of speculation. Further, he argues that Aristotle's remarks about females in his biological writings did not tend to promote the inferior status of ancient Greek women." "The Female in Aristole's Biology will be of value to students of philosophy, the history of science, and classical literature."--Jacket.
Local note
SACFinal081324
Reviews from GoodReads
Loading GoodReads Reviews.
Citations
APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)
Mayhew, R. (2004). The female in Aristotle's biology: reason or rationalization . University of Chicago Press.
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Mayhew, Robert. 2004. The Female in Aristotle's Biology: Reason or Rationalization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)Mayhew, Robert. The Female in Aristotle's Biology: Reason or Rationalization Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.
Harvard Citation (style guide)Mayhew, R. (2004). The female in aristotle's biology: reason or rationalization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)Mayhew, Robert. The Female in Aristotle's Biology: Reason or Rationalization University of Chicago Press, 2004.
Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.
Staff View
Loading Staff View.