Bottlenecks : a new theory of equal opportunity
(Book)

Book Cover
Average Rating
Status
General Shelving - 3rd Floor
KF4755 .F57 2014
1 available

Description

Loading Description...

Also in this Series

Checking series information...

Copies

LocationCall NumberStatus
General Shelving - 3rd FloorKF4755 .F57 2014On Shelf

More Like This

Loading more titles like this title...

More Details

Format
Book
Physical Desc
vii, 269 pages : illustrations ; 24 cm
Language
English

Notes

General Note
Based on the author's thesis (doctoral)--Oxford University, 2009, under the title: Opportunity pluralism.
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description
Equal opportunity is a powerful idea, and one with extremely broad appeal in contemporary politics, political theory, and law. But what does it mean? On close examination, the most attractive existing conceptions of equal opportunity turn out to be impossible to achieve in practice, or even in theory. As long as families are free to raise their children differently, no two people's opportunities will be equal; nor is it possible to disentangle someone's abilities or talents from her background advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, given different abilities and disabilities, different people need different opportunities, confounding most ways of imagining what counts as "equal." This book proposes an entirely new way of thinking about the project of equal opportunity. Instead of focusing on the chimera of literal equalization, we ought to work to broaden the range of opportunities open to people at every stage in life. We can achieve this in part by loosening the bottlenecks that constrain access to opportunities-the narrow places through which people must pass in order to pursue many life paths that open out on the other side. A bottleneck might be a test like the SAT, a credential requirement like a college degree, or a skill like speaking English. It might be membership in a favored caste or racial group. Bottlenecks are part of the opportunity structure of every society. But their severity varies. By loosening them, we can build a more open and pluralistic opportunity structure in which people have more of a chance, throughout their lives, to pursue paths they choose for themselves-rather than those dictated by limited opportunities. This book develops this idea and other elements of opportunity pluralism, then applies this approach to several contemporary egalitarian policy problems: class and access to education, workplace flexibility and work/family conflict, and antidiscrimination law. A bold, original theory of equal opportunity ; Applies the theory to important contemporary problems in public policy and law including class inequality, workplace flexibility, and antidiscrimination law ; Engages with, and raises fundamental questions about, responsibility-catering theories of distributive justice ; An argument informed by research about the role of developmental opportunities from the social and natural sciences ; Offers a view of how opportunities matter, in part, because they shape our preferences, ambitions, and values.--Publisher website.
Local note
SACFinal081324

Reviews from GoodReads

Loading GoodReads Reviews.

Citations

APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)

Fishkin, J. (2014). Bottlenecks: a new theory of equal opportunity . Oxford University Press.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Fishkin, Joseph. 2014. Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Fishkin, Joseph. Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

Harvard Citation (style guide)

Fishkin, J. (2014). Bottlenecks: a new theory of equal opportunity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)

Fishkin, Joseph. Bottlenecks: A New Theory of Equal Opportunity Oxford University Press, 2014.

Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.

Staff View

Loading Staff View.