The reception of Grimms' fairy tales : responses, reactions, revisions
(Book)

Book Cover
Average Rating
Contributors
Status
General Shelving - 3rd Floor
PT921 .R4 1993
2 available

Description

Loading Description...

Also in this Series

Checking series information...

Copies

LocationCall NumberStatus
General Shelving - 3rd FloorPT921 .R4 1993On Shelf
General Shelving - 3rd FloorPT921 .R4 1993On Shelf

More Like This

Loading more titles like this title...

More Details

Format
Book
Physical Desc
347 pages : illustrations ; 24 cm
Language
English

Notes

General Note
"Manufactured in the United States of America ; Designer: Mary Primeau"--Title page verso.
Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Description
"As a book, Grimms' Fairy Tales has been with us less than two hundred years, yet it is recognized as one of the most widely known tomes in the world. Explanations for the book's popularity and longevity have typically been one-dimensional generalizations about a universal quality residing within the tales themselves. The tales endure, we are told, because they are timeless, true, or good." "The Reception of Grimms' Fairy Tales rejects the notion that Grimms' tales have enjoyed continued success because of their "ageless magic." Instead this volume explores the historical, cultural, and personal factors that have caused the tales to elicit, from their original publication to the present, extremely diverse responses, reactions, and revisions." "The history of the tales' reception goes far beyond the simple success story of a good book that has been widely accepted because of its moral and aesthetic appeal. Those who encounter the stories - scholars, translators, editors, readers, writers, storytellers, or artists - have interpreted the stories from their own perspectives and for their own purposes. The reception, then, reflects a dynamic process involving the acceptance, rejection, transformation, and revision of a protean book of stories." "This illustrated volume brings together premier scholars of the fairy tale, including Ruth B. Bottigheimer, Maria Tatar, and Jack Zipes, with acclaimed creative writers such as Margaret Atwood, Angela Carter, Jane Yolen, and award-winning artist Trina Schart Hyman. Ranging from scholarly essay to personal memoir and fictional recreation, their work embodies the diverse responses that readers have had to Grimms' fairy tales."
Description
"The essays address the reception of the Grimms' texts by their readers; the dynamics between Grimms' collection and its earliest audiences; and aspects of the literary, philosophical, creative, and oral reception of the tales, illuminating how writers, philosophers, artists, and storytellers have responded to, reacted to, and revised the stories, thus shedding light on the ways in which past and contemporary transmitters of culture have understood and passed on the Grimms' tales"--,Jacket.
Local note
SACFinal081324

Reviews from GoodReads

Loading GoodReads Reviews.

Citations

APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)

Haase, D., & Primeau, M. (1993). The reception of Grimms' fairy tales: responses, reactions, revisions . Wayne State University Press.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Haase, Donald and Mary, Primeau. 1993. The Reception of Grimms' Fairy Tales: Responses, Reactions, Revisions. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Haase, Donald and Mary, Primeau. The Reception of Grimms' Fairy Tales: Responses, Reactions, Revisions Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1993.

Harvard Citation (style guide)

Haase, D. and Primeau, M. (1993). The reception of grimms' fairy tales: responses, reactions, revisions. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)

Haase, Donald,, and Mary Primeau. The Reception of Grimms' Fairy Tales: Responses, Reactions, Revisions Wayne State University Press, 1993.

Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.

Staff View

Loading Staff View.