Disability : controversial debates and psychosocial perspectives
(Book)

Book Cover
Average Rating
Status
General Shelving - 3rd Floor
HV1568.2 .M37 1999
1 available

Description

Loading Description...

Also in this Series

Checking series information...

Copies

LocationCall NumberStatus
General Shelving - 3rd FloorHV1568.2 .M37 1999On Shelf

More Like This

Loading more titles like this title...

More Details

Format
Book
Physical Desc
xiv, 217 pages ; 22 cm
Language
English

Notes

Bibliography
Includes bibliographical references (pages 193-209) and index.
Description
Disability: Controversial Debates and Psychosocial Perspectives examines various theories and practices relating to disability. The focus of the work is not disabled people as "objects" of study but rather an analysis of disability as it has been historically and culturally constructed. The topics covered range from language and discourse, interpersonal relationships and "disability" professions to public policy and the politics of disability. This book is essential reading for students of Disability Studies as well as policy-makers and professionals in social policy, social work and nursing.
Local note
SACFinal081324

Reviews from GoodReads

Loading GoodReads Reviews.

Citations

APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)

Marks, D. (1999). Disability: controversial debates and psychosocial perspectives . Routledge.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Marks, Deborah, 1964-. 1999. Disability: Controversial Debates and Psychosocial Perspectives. Routledge.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

Marks, Deborah, 1964-. Disability: Controversial Debates and Psychosocial Perspectives Routledge, 1999.

MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)

Marks, Deborah. Disability: Controversial Debates and Psychosocial Perspectives Routledge, 1999.

Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.

Staff View

Loading Staff View.